Friday Sep.18, 2020

❄️ The Snowflake IPO problem

_Institutional investors watching their Snowflakes rise_
_Institutional investors watching their Snowflakes rise_

Hey Snackers,

A species of rare, permanently-smiling turtles has been saved from extinction in Myanmar. We hope your Friday is as happy as the face of a Burmese Roofed Turtle (#RestingBlissFace).

The market dipped yesterday as (you guessed it) Big Tech stocks fell.

IPO

Snowflake had the biggest software IPO ever, and it reveals a problem with IPOs

Investors didn't flake... on Snowflake's IPO. The cloud company went public on the NYSE on Tuesday, trading under ticker “SNOW” (cuutee). The only thing cute about Snowflake is its name. The actual business is about offering cloud-based data management and analytics.

  • Snowflake stock more than doubled on its 1st trading day, giving the company a massive $70B market value.
  • Then the stock fell 10% yesterday. It's growing fast as revenues doubled from last year, but... it's still unprofitable.

Snowflake = Ariana Grande?... Companies that do a traditional IPO (like Snowflake) hire investment banks like Goldman Sachs to underwrite their new stock offering. Underwriters take on risk, decide the IPO value, and essentially act as talent managers for the stock star: they go on tour (aka: "roadshow") to build interest from institutional investors like mutual funds and brokerages. Those VIP investors are the ones who actually buy the stock "initially" during its Initial Public Offering.

Traditional IPOs have some downsides... Snowflake raised $3.4B in new money for itself by selling stock at its IPO price of $120. It was the biggest software IPO ever. Buuuut: only VIP institutional investors got to buy shares at $120. Then, they unleashed them on the market for the rest of us...

  • Retail investors missed out on a big price jump. By the time Snowflake hit the market, it was trading at $245 on pent-up demand.
  • Snowflake missed out on raising more money by selling at a higher stock price. After it sold stock for $120, Snowflake didn't benefit directly when the stock soared to $245.
  • Institutional investors doubled their money in a day. The IPO seems to have been under-priced, allowing them to sit back and watch their newly bought stock rise.
  • That's one reason private companies are increasingly looking at SPACs and Direct Listings as alternatives to the IPO status quo.
See

Facebook teams up with Luxottica to ship Ray-Ban "smart glasses" in 2021

Success is buying $3 glasses from a stand... and having everyone think they're Ray-Bans. Facebook disagrees, so it's partnering with Italian glasses giant Luxottica for its upcoming smart glasses. Luxottica makes fancy shades from luxury brands like Persol, Prada, and Oliver Peoples. But Zuck is only interested in its Ray-Bans:

  • What to expect: "Smart" Ray-Ban glasses, ETA 2021. FB was super vague about what actually makes these glasses smart. We're expecting photo taking/uploading functionality.
  • What not to expect: Augmented reality. The glasses don't have an integrated display — zero Pikachus will appear as you walk, and no 3D Insta model will pop up as you scroll your feed.

Is Facebook throwing shade?... FB would love to be the one to finally make smart glasses a thing, since all its tech peers have so far failed so far.

  • Google's "Google Glass" was an epic fail. They made people look like fake scientists without adding any daily value.
  • Snap tried with "Spectacles" (multiple times) and lost $40M on 300K unsold pairs.
  • Apple is working on Apple Glass, but we probably won't see those until 2023. Apple's being super secretive (classic) about the details.

Facebook thinks it can make this work by removing the "Facebook"... So far, Big Tech's smart glasses simply haven't provided much usable value. Facebook's differentiator: it's partnering with a well-loved sunglasses brand instead of designing the frames itself (like the other techies did). They're branded Ray-Ban glasses — not Facebook glasses. FB thinks it can avoid its competitors' failure by making "the first truly fashionable smart glasses.”

What else we’re Snackin’

  • Saga: Oracle and Bytedance have reportedly agreed to the Treasury Department's terms for the US operation of TikTok — Walmart's also interested in investing.
  • Charge: Chargepoint, the world's largest electric vehicle charging network, is nearing a deal to bring its orange charging stations public (you might've seen them in parking lots).
  • Toned: Tonal, the at-home strength training company backed by Amazon and Steph Curry, raises an extra $110M in funding.
  • Descend: Airline execs make a final plea for more federal aid — tens of thousands of employees are set to be furloughed on October 1st when aid expires.
  • Oh: Apple announced its 1st partnership with a country — Singapore will pay residents to do health-related activities tracked on Apple Watch.

🍪 Thanks for Snacking with us! Want to share the Snacks? Invite your friends to sign up here.

Friday

  • Consumer sentiment data released
  • Unity Software's IPO

Disclosure: Authors of this Snacks own shares of Apple

ID: 1336382

Get Your News

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Stories

Markets

Chipotle continues to go on a tear, hitting a sales record

Hey it might not be the kind of AI stock investors are all hot and bothered over, but don’t sleep on the burrito business.

Chipotle posted much better-than-expected results on Wednesday, with sales rising 14% to a record $2.70B in the first quarter, which is like a billion additions of guac.

Profits jumped 23% to $359M.

Chipotle has quietly cruised higher over the last year. It’s up 63%, compared to the 24.5% gain for the S&P 500 over the 12 months through Wednesday’s close. Not bad for a rice-and-beans based business model.

Tech

Facebook had great earnings, the market hates it

Facebook reported impressive earnings. Record first-quarter revenue thanks to AI! Profit up 117% compared to a year earlier! But at the same time, its capital expenditures are going up and it’s expecting second quarter revenue potentially lower than analyst estimates. So in other words, the future doesn’t look as bright as the present.

All in all the stock is down more than 10%. (Basically the opposite of what happened with Tesla yesterday).

Go Deeper with Market Depth

Nasdaq TotalView powers the need-to-know data serious investors rely on.

Scuba Diving in the Wild Blue Yonder in French Polynesia
Business

Why Tesla investors are holding on to hope for a cheap car

Despite terrible earnings numbers last night — declining vehicle sales, disappointing revenue and profit, enormous spending — Tesla stock is up more than 10% as of midday. That’s a welcome move for the car company, that’s been among the worst performers this year in the S&P 500.

Why the about face?

While Reuters reported earlier this month that Tesla is no longer making its long-awaited $25,000 mass-market car — news sent the stock, already suffering from headwinds across the EV industry, down even further— Tesla reported during its earnings that it’s going to make cheaper cars than it currently has.

Before the second half of next year, Tesla said it will release “more affordable models” that “will utilize aspects of the next generation platform as well as aspects of our current platforms, and will be able to be produced on the same manufacturing lines as our current vehicle line-up.”

So rather than release the $25,000 Model 2, Tesla is incorporating some of that technology into its existing models. UBS called it the Franken-3Y2.

Job switchers and stayers

The FTC is banning non-compete clauses

Why that might make job switching even more lucrative

Your inbox is ready

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Culture

Not so Gucci

French luxury fashion conglomerate Kering has seen its shares fall ~10% in the last 24 hours after reporting that sales at its flagship brand Gucci had dropped 21% in its latest quarter.

Kering’s other brands, which include Yves Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, and Balenciaga, fared slightly better — but the only real bright spot was the company’s eyewear division, where sales rose 24% (9% on a comparable basis).

With Gucci responsible for roughly two-thirds of the company’s profit, the ongoing struggles of the brand are weighing heavily on the bottom line: the company expects recurring operating profit to drop 40-45% in the first six months of the year.

Gucci execs will be hoping that new designer Sabato de Sarno can turn the iconic brand’s fortunes around, particularly in China where demand has dropped precipitously. His designs only started hitting stores in February.

Gucci sales

With Gucci responsible for roughly two-thirds of the company’s profit, the ongoing struggles of the brand are weighing heavily on the bottom line: the company expects recurring operating profit to drop 40-45% in the first six months of the year.

Gucci execs will be hoping that new designer Sabato de Sarno can turn the iconic brand’s fortunes around, particularly in China where demand has dropped precipitously. His designs only started hitting stores in February.

Gucci sales
Business

The FTC vs. Big Handbag

The Federal Trade Commission has sued to block big tech, big grocery, big vacuum, and now, big… “affordable luxury handbag.”

Yesterday, the FTC sued to block Tapestry Inc’s $8.5B acquisition of Capri holdings. The agency is worried that a merger between Tapestry, which owns the Coach and Kate Spade brands, and Capri, which owns Michael Kors, would eliminate competition in the market.

The crux of the FTC's argument lies in the scope of the "accessible luxury" handbag market, where Tapestry competes with Michael Kors, with the FTC saying the following:

Where Tapestry and Capri most vigorously compete against one another – mainly between Tapestry’s Coach and Kate Spade brands against Capri’s Michael Kors brand – is in the “accessible luxury” handbag market. Today, Coach, Kate Spade and Michael Kors continuously monitor each other’s handbag brands to determine pricing and performance, and they each use that information to make strategic decisions, including whether to raise or lower handbag prices.

The deal would eliminate fierce head-to-head competition on many important attributes including on price, discounting, and design. Tens of millions of Americans that purchase Coach, Kade Spade, and Michael Kors products could face higher prices

While Capri and Tapestry are two of the largest players in this market, winning an antitrust case won't be so straightforward, as consumers have other options at similar price points, including Marc Jacobs (owned by competitor LVMH), Tory Burch, Cuyana, and Mansur.

The crux of the FTC's argument lies in the scope of the "accessible luxury" handbag market, where Tapestry competes with Michael Kors, with the FTC saying the following:

Where Tapestry and Capri most vigorously compete against one another – mainly between Tapestry’s Coach and Kate Spade brands against Capri’s Michael Kors brand – is in the “accessible luxury” handbag market. Today, Coach, Kate Spade and Michael Kors continuously monitor each other’s handbag brands to determine pricing and performance, and they each use that information to make strategic decisions, including whether to raise or lower handbag prices.

The deal would eliminate fierce head-to-head competition on many important attributes including on price, discounting, and design. Tens of millions of Americans that purchase Coach, Kade Spade, and Michael Kors products could face higher prices

While Capri and Tapestry are two of the largest players in this market, winning an antitrust case won't be so straightforward, as consumers have other options at similar price points, including Marc Jacobs (owned by competitor LVMH), Tory Burch, Cuyana, and Mansur.

Tesla had a good ride, but the stock’s price destruction is historic

Few people have created as much value as Elon Musk. The iconoclastic entrepreneur took Tesla from a market capitalization of roughly $2 billion at the time of its IPO in 2010 to $1.2 trillion in early 2023. That’s a return of about 55,000%. Musk made a lot of people a lot of money.

On the other hand, Tesla shares are down nearly 60% since their all-time peak. The company has ceded ground in EVs, prompting a series of profit crushing price cuts to preserve market share. The cumulative loss in market value over that period is pushing $800 billion. Few corporate executives have presided over such a degree of value destruction.

And it could get worse, as people are bracing for an ugly update when Tesla reports after the close Tuesday.