Hey Snackers,
Happy belated 15th birthday, Gmail.
Solid manufacturing data from the US and China got the 2nd quarter going right — And the S&P 500 closed in on its highest point of 2019.
Going full paleo?... Kellogg is cleansing its home: For $1.3B, Italian sweets legend Ferrero beat out Twinkie icon Hostess Brands in a multi-month bidding battle for the Kellogg's dessert. The winnings include elf-powered Keebler, Famous Amos, fruit snacks, and even Girl Scout cookies (#SaveTheSamoas).
Cookies need love, too... And that's what Ferrero does — It turns around tired candy brands with marketing love. It recently bought some candy bars from Nestlé for $1B and already reintroduced a "Better Butterfinger" (with bigger peanuts 👌). Kellogg's hadn't been giving its older candy brands the attention they needed, and it shows:
Unhealthy isn't totally unhealthy... Kellogg's stock is down 11% in the last year as consumer tastes shift, and its sugar-fueled cereals lose out to chia pudding. But the calorie-infused brands that Kellogg has treated with marketing money are actually doing just fine.
Long-term exclusive commitment... Saudi Arabia has historically been a one company Kingdom. That's Saudi Aramco, the state-owned oil giant. And as a privately-owned company, Aramco's financials enjoyed secret status. But now that it'll participate in public markets for the 1st time, we get a look at its (gigantic) numbers.
$15B to spare?... That's all Aramco's asking to borrow. To convince investors it's good for the money, it's showing off its profits. And they're extremely connected to whatever oil prices are doing:
This may shake the oil habit... Aramco's profits fund 70% of Saudi Arabia's national budget. That worries Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as car giants and nations go electric. The $15B that Aramco's borrowing will give the Prince money to invest in economy-diversifying anything (he's got a thing for US tech and movie theaters).
But is it fake?... For 23 full minutes, John Oliver's Last Week Tonight put World Wrestling Entertainment in a figure-four leg-lock. The Sunday night show claimed WWE wrestlers are independent contractors facing brutal work conditions. WWE shares fell 2.3% early Monday before rebounding back.
The ring of public opinion... That's where the stock's moves all played out. WWE was accused of blocking wrestler unions and offering them no benefits, just to save money. Then WWE aggressively denied everything from the HBO segment, claiming it could "refute every point in his one-sided presentation."
Feels like a docu-doozy re-run... High-profile exposés and documentaries that damage a brand can hurt share prices long-term. Here's who else has also suffered from the stuff on TV: