Thursday Jan.09, 2020

Grubhub cooks itself up for sale

_The Delivery Wars: "Tell them to get their calzone out of my territory..."_
_The Delivery Wars: "Tell them to get their calzone out of my territory..."_

Hey Snackers,

Working at Disney for free is 40 times harder than getting into Harvard. 10,000 people applied. 14 got Mickey's acceptance letter.

Markets stayed relatively stable as US/Iran tensions appeared to cool.

Deliver

Gruhub may sell itself because of the mafia-style delivery wars

News, delivered hot (28 minutes after the ETA)... Grubhub shares spiked on word the food-deliverer is considering selling itself (+ fries, sauce on side). If Grubhub gets acquired like the WSJ reported it might, it'll probably be at a higher price than where the stock was trading yesterday — that's why shares jumped 13%.

  • 2004: Grubhub is founded in Chicago as a menu-posting site — then it merged with delivery rival Seamless in 2013.
  • 2014: Grubhub IPOs with a $4.5B valuation, ultimately reaching $13B just over a year go.
  • 2019: Shares plunged over 40% in October on delivery of disappointing earnings -- it's now back to a $5B valuation (barely better than its IPO value).

You're becoming "more promiscuous"... That's what Grubhub's CEO thinks about us diners. Grubhubers used to be loyal, one-app customers. Now they're flirting with the competition, and it's an (expensive) marketing battle of "$5-off-next-order" promo codes to win them back. We noticed that delivery apps are divided by territory, mafia-style:

  • DoorDash (37% of the US market): Dominates the West, with most of the market share in San Francisco, Phoenix, and Dallas.
  • Grubhub (30%): Runs the East Coast, from Philadelphia to New York to Boston.
  • Uber Eats (20%): Took over the Atlanta-to-Miami corridor.
  • Postmates (10%) is LA-approved (it's pretty much only got LA).

If you can't beat 'em... Consolidate. The Delivery Wars are so vicious that even Amazon dropped its restaurant delivery service last year. With un-loyal customers and aggressive price competition, mergers are inevitable. Doordash already bought Caviar, and Grubhub might have to sell itself or merge — that's cheaper than splurging on marketing to beat Uber Eats in Miami.

Heard

Spotify introduces a new service to make podcast ads more like Facebook ads

Don't skip through this ad... Spotify could become the #1 podcast monetizer thanks to “Streaming Ad Insertion” (note to Spotify: Please rebrand that name). Instead of 1 ad per podcast played to all listeners (forever), Spotify's offering this combo:

  1. Targeted ads: 2 different people, listening to the same pod, get different ads (odds are a direct-to-consumer mattress ad for one, a natural deodorant subscription ad for the other).
  2. Refreshed ads: A pod recorded today could have an ad for Frozen II. Next year that ad would switch to Frozen III instead. Boom. Dynamically changed.

Nothing angers a marketer more... than when someone hears their ad, but hates their product. Cheesecake Factory making a podcast ad? Lactose-intolerant people will hear it. That's a wasted ad. They'd rather the ad target only 18-36 year-old males who like food that's cheesy, meaty, and cheesy. We've seen this before.

  • Facebook's ads are uber targeted (because Zuck knows you're in the "Gaga for Gouda" Facebook group).
  • Since targeted ads are more likely to resonate and sell cheesecake goods, they're more expensive for advertisers (and lucrative for Facebook/Spotify).

Spotify’s secret weapon isn’t just data — it’s their willingness to use it... Spotify knows your age, gender, location, and what music you’re listening to (for Snacks Daily listeners, it's Post Malone, Drake, and Ariana Grande). It’s willing to use that data to segment listeners into groups hearing different ads. But pod-rival Apple hasn't been willing to do that — privacy is their major selling point.

What else we’re Snackin’

  • Classy-er: Fitness startup ClassPass stretches into a unicorn status thanks to a new $285M funding round
  • Uber-er: Uber makes pricing and feature changes in California to strengthen its defense against the gig-work law (if you uber in CA, you prob got the email)
  • Futur-er: Walmart unveils Alphabot, a techy new platform to pack and deliver your groceries (and protect Walmart's spot as America's largest grocer)
  • Bumm-er: JPMorgan Chase raises the fee on Millenials' favorite travel credit card, the Chase Sapphire Reserve (the fancy metal will now cost you $100 more per year)
  • Cool-er: Streaming startup Quibi doesn't launch until April, but it'll intro over 175 original shows you can watch in an innovative vertical/horizontal "turnstyle" mode

Thursday

Disclosure: Authors of this Snacks own shares of Uber, Amazon, Spotify, and JPMorgan Chase

ID: 1052914

Get Your News

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Stories

Markets

Chipotle continues to go on a tear, hitting a sales record

Hey it might not be the kind of AI stock investors are all hot and bothered over, but don’t sleep on the burrito business.

Chipotle posted much better-than-expected results on Wednesday, with sales rising 14% to a record $2.70B in the first quarter, which is like a billion additions of guac.

Profits jumped 23% to $359M.

Chipotle has quietly cruised higher over the last year. It’s up 63%, compared to the 24.5% gain for the S&P 500 over the 12 months through Wednesday’s close. Not bad for a rice-and-beans based business model.

Tech

Facebook had great earnings, the market hates it

Facebook reported impressive earnings. Record first-quarter revenue thanks to AI! Profit up 117% compared to a year earlier! But at the same time, its capital expenditures are going up and it’s expecting second quarter revenue potentially lower than analyst estimates. So in other words, the future doesn’t look as bright as the present.

All in all the stock is down more than 10%. (Basically the opposite of what happened with Tesla yesterday).

Go Deeper with Market Depth

Nasdaq TotalView powers the need-to-know data serious investors rely on.

Scuba Diving in the Wild Blue Yonder in French Polynesia
Business

Why Tesla investors are holding on to hope for a cheap car

Despite terrible earnings numbers last night — declining vehicle sales, disappointing revenue and profit, enormous spending — Tesla stock is up more than 10% as of midday. That’s a welcome move for the car company, that’s been among the worst performers this year in the S&P 500.

Why the about face?

While Reuters reported earlier this month that Tesla is no longer making its long-awaited $25,000 mass-market car — news sent the stock, already suffering from headwinds across the EV industry, down even further— Tesla reported during its earnings that it’s going to make cheaper cars than it currently has.

Before the second half of next year, Tesla said it will release “more affordable models” that “will utilize aspects of the next generation platform as well as aspects of our current platforms, and will be able to be produced on the same manufacturing lines as our current vehicle line-up.”

So rather than release the $25,000 Model 2, Tesla is incorporating some of that technology into its existing models. UBS called it the Franken-3Y2.

Job switchers and stayers

The FTC is banning non-compete clauses

Why that might make job switching even more lucrative

Your inbox is ready

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Culture

Not so Gucci

French luxury fashion conglomerate Kering has seen its shares fall ~10% in the last 24 hours after reporting that sales at its flagship brand Gucci had dropped 21% in its latest quarter.

Kering’s other brands, which include Yves Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, and Balenciaga, fared slightly better — but the only real bright spot was the company’s eyewear division, where sales rose 24% (9% on a comparable basis).

With Gucci responsible for roughly two-thirds of the company’s profit, the ongoing struggles of the brand are weighing heavily on the bottom line: the company expects recurring operating profit to drop 40-45% in the first six months of the year.

Gucci execs will be hoping that new designer Sabato de Sarno can turn the iconic brand’s fortunes around, particularly in China where demand has dropped precipitously. His designs only started hitting stores in February.

Gucci sales

With Gucci responsible for roughly two-thirds of the company’s profit, the ongoing struggles of the brand are weighing heavily on the bottom line: the company expects recurring operating profit to drop 40-45% in the first six months of the year.

Gucci execs will be hoping that new designer Sabato de Sarno can turn the iconic brand’s fortunes around, particularly in China where demand has dropped precipitously. His designs only started hitting stores in February.

Gucci sales
Business

The FTC vs. Big Handbag

The Federal Trade Commission has sued to block big tech, big grocery, big vacuum, and now, big… “affordable luxury handbag.”

Yesterday, the FTC sued to block Tapestry Inc’s $8.5B acquisition of Capri holdings. The agency is worried that a merger between Tapestry, which owns the Coach and Kate Spade brands, and Capri, which owns Michael Kors, would eliminate competition in the market.

The crux of the FTC's argument lies in the scope of the "accessible luxury" handbag market, where Tapestry competes with Michael Kors, with the FTC saying the following:

Where Tapestry and Capri most vigorously compete against one another – mainly between Tapestry’s Coach and Kate Spade brands against Capri’s Michael Kors brand – is in the “accessible luxury” handbag market. Today, Coach, Kate Spade and Michael Kors continuously monitor each other’s handbag brands to determine pricing and performance, and they each use that information to make strategic decisions, including whether to raise or lower handbag prices.

The deal would eliminate fierce head-to-head competition on many important attributes including on price, discounting, and design. Tens of millions of Americans that purchase Coach, Kade Spade, and Michael Kors products could face higher prices

While Capri and Tapestry are two of the largest players in this market, winning an antitrust case won't be so straightforward, as consumers have other options at similar price points, including Marc Jacobs (owned by competitor LVMH), Tory Burch, Cuyana, and Mansur.

The crux of the FTC's argument lies in the scope of the "accessible luxury" handbag market, where Tapestry competes with Michael Kors, with the FTC saying the following:

Where Tapestry and Capri most vigorously compete against one another – mainly between Tapestry’s Coach and Kate Spade brands against Capri’s Michael Kors brand – is in the “accessible luxury” handbag market. Today, Coach, Kate Spade and Michael Kors continuously monitor each other’s handbag brands to determine pricing and performance, and they each use that information to make strategic decisions, including whether to raise or lower handbag prices.

The deal would eliminate fierce head-to-head competition on many important attributes including on price, discounting, and design. Tens of millions of Americans that purchase Coach, Kade Spade, and Michael Kors products could face higher prices

While Capri and Tapestry are two of the largest players in this market, winning an antitrust case won't be so straightforward, as consumers have other options at similar price points, including Marc Jacobs (owned by competitor LVMH), Tory Burch, Cuyana, and Mansur.

Tesla had a good ride, but the stock’s price destruction is historic

Few people have created as much value as Elon Musk. The iconoclastic entrepreneur took Tesla from a market capitalization of roughly $2 billion at the time of its IPO in 2010 to $1.2 trillion in early 2023. That’s a return of about 55,000%. Musk made a lot of people a lot of money.

On the other hand, Tesla shares are down nearly 60% since their all-time peak. The company has ceded ground in EVs, prompting a series of profit crushing price cuts to preserve market share. The cumulative loss in market value over that period is pushing $800 billion. Few corporate executives have presided over such a degree of value destruction.

And it could get worse, as people are bracing for an ugly update when Tesla reports after the close Tuesday.