Thursday Jul.30, 2020

🍿 AMC Theaters pulls a 180

_Big Tech's Congressional Zoom sesh_
_Big Tech's Congressional Zoom sesh_

Hey Snackers,

The banker who drops bangers is back. Goldman Sachs' CEO David Solomon, aka DJ D-sol, opened for the Chainsmokers at a Hamptons party (casual). Crowds gathered to watch DJ D-sol spin his bankable EDM tracks. Now the concert is being investigated for overcrowding. Doesn't get better than this, folks.

Tech stocks led the market surge yesterday, all while Big Tech CEOs were getting grilled by Congress. Also market-moving: the Fed decided to keep interest rates low to continue stimulating the economy. Earnings from Amazon, Apple, and Google drop today.

Watch

AMC and Universal will slash the theatrical window period in a historic agreement

Major plot twist... Three months ago, AMC banned all Universal movies from its theaters after some Trolls drama. TLDR: Universal made bank releasing Trolls World Tour direct to streaming, and said it'll do both digital and theatrical releases going forward. AMC reacted by excommunicating Universal. Now the two have struck a game-changing truce:

  • They're slashing the theatrical window from 75 days to just 17 days for Universal films shown at AMC theaters.
  • Theatrical window: The period that a movie has to be exclusively in theaters before release for home viewing.

An Oscar-worthy win for streamers... and a loss for theaters. The window has long been key to theaters' sales. Even though the first three weekends make up the bulk of those, slashing the window from 2.5 months to 2.5 weeks encourages people to wait for digital releases (manageable FOMO).

  • Customers get: Savings. While digital rentals will likely cost ~$20, there's no "pay-per-butt" charge. The whole family can watch for the price of 1 (and skip the $17 popcorn).
  • Universal gets: Money. Universal made more off 3 weeks of Trolls online rentals than 5 months of the original theater release. Big reason: streaming platforms take a smaller cut of sales than theaters do.
  • AMC gets: A lifeline. Theaters have been closed since March, and AMC could be looking at bankruptcy soon. Now it'll reportedly get a cut of Universal's sales from digital rentals and rights to release new Universal films on its own on-demand service.

This could become the status quo... AMC is the world’s largest theater chain and Universal is a major studio. Others could follow their major league window-slashing. By the time the pandemic is over, homebound consumers might be used to saving money by watching new movies at home. Short windows might keep getting shorter (or even become non-existent).

Testify

Big Tech CEOs get grilled while trying to prove they're not monopolies

Grab the popcorn... The latest season of Big Tech vs. Congress dropped yesterday. Besides a few screaming matches and some technical difficulties, important questions were raised around anti-competitive activities of Big Tech companies. Highlights from the stars:

  • Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos made his Congressional debut. He got grilled on using data from 3rd party vendors to make competing (and cheaper) Amazon products.
  • Google CEO Sundar Pichai got hammered with questions around favoring Google products or paid ads over relevant search queries.
  • Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg got grilled on copying features of successful competitors, or acquiring them to crush threats (especially RE: Instagram).
  • Apple CEO Tim Cook got let off easy (the fewest questions), mainly around Apple playing favorites on its App Store and making things overly complicated for developers.

Grab the PR flashcards... All four CEOs took the stance that they do face real competition, and that everything they do is to improve products for their customers. Overall, the whole thing was often Congresspeople making their statements without actually listening to answers, and CEOs trying to waste as much time as possible by circumventing questions. Niiice.

Will anything actually come from these Congressional TV dramas?... The biggest thing would be a change in competition laws. Overall though, these hearings have rarely affected regulation. Buuut: a rare bipartisan unity clearly emerged around hostility to Big Tech (though the reasons varied). This hearing likely serves more as a slap on the hand than a game-changer.

Cook

Blue Apron has its 1st-ever profitable quarter — but the stock still melted 15%

Varsity Blues... Meal kit company Blue Apron has been sitting on the bench as its rival HelloFresh scores all the points. It was worth $2B when it IPO'd in 2017 — now it’s worth just $160M. Then the pandemic lifted the tide for all at-home-cooking ships, and Blue Apron finally got its shot in the game. It delivered:

  • Blue Apron turned a quarterly profit for the 1st time ever, taking home $1.1M compared to a $7.7M loss during the same quarter last year.
  • Thank the ARPU: Average Revenue Per User. Blue Apron's ARPU surged 25%, with the average customer spending $331 in the quarter (up from $265). Sales jumped 10%.

But no one was cheering... Sigh. Despite the profit win, Blue Apron stock plunged 15% because:

  • Growth was underwhelming, like a poorly seasoned Bok Choy. It added only 20K new customers, a 5% growth bump.
  • $18M will be lost this quarter, according to Blue Apron's unappetizing forecast. Higher labor costs (like employee bonuses) are eating into profits.

Blue Apron still has a shrinkage problem... It didn't make a profit because it's growing — it made a profit because the highly unusual pandemic made home-cooking spend surge. Despite its higher ARPU, Blue Apron's customer count is actually getting smaller. It now has 396K customers, down from 449K last year. Investors think the profit was a one-hit pandemic wonder. Since investors are all about future growth, they plunged the stock.

What else we’re Snackin’

  • Tune: Spotify missed quarterly sales expectations and lost $419M — while monthly active users jumped a solid 29%, ad revenue fell 21%.
  • Billions: GE posts a $2B quarterly loss — its jet engine biz was hit hard on decimated travel demand.
  • Tok: TikTok is valued at around $50B by some investors in its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, that are trying to do a takeover.
  • Shopped: Shopify nearly doubled its quarterly sales as retailers tapped Canada's biggest tech company to get their stores online
  • Leftover: Tupperware shares surge 65% after the leftover legend posts a 60% jump in profits thanks to a fresh sales strategy (though sales actually fell 16%).
  • Tired: GM swings to an $800M loss and burns through almost $8B on closed factories and corona-plunged car sales.

🍪 Thanks for Snacking with us! Want to share the Snacks? Invite your friends to sign up here.

Thursday

Disclosure: Authors of this Snacks own shares of Amazon, Apple, Spotify, and Shopify

ID: 1284803

Get Your News

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Stories

Go Deeper with Market Depth

Nasdaq TotalView powers the need-to-know data serious investors rely on.

Scuba Diving in the Wild Blue Yonder in French Polynesia
Power

World out of balance: It costs the US 3¢ to make 1 penny

The cost of producing the US penny rose 13% in fiscal 2023 to 3.07 cents. Yes, that means that Uncle Sam loses more than two cents for every cent it produces. (And no, you can’t make it up on volume.)

For the record, that’s the 18th-straight year the penny’s face value has been below production costs, fueling calls for abolishing the lowest value denomination coin. Canada started to phase out the penny in 2013, joining Australia, Brazil, Finland, New Zealand, Norway, and Israel, according to Smithsonian Magazine.

3.07¢

Your inbox is ready

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Business

Netflix is going to stop sharing subscriber numbers

After posting subscriber numbers that beat expectations today, Netflix says it’s no longer going to share those numbers starting in the first quarter of 2025. That’s a big deal since subscriber numbers have long been one of the main metrics that investors have looked at.

“In our early days, when we had little revenue or profit, membership growth was a strong indicator of our future potential,” its shareholders letter read. “But now we’re generating very substantial profit and free cash flow.” The company said that it will focus on revenue and operating margin as its main financial metrics, while it will look at time spent on the platform to gauge customer satisfaction.

Another way to read this? They’ve hit market saturation and just aren’t going to be growing that much anymore, and they thought they’d end on a good note. Going forward they’re focusing on how to get more money out of the customers they do have.

They’re doing so by cracking down on password sharing and charging for extra members. They’re also pushing people to ad tiers, which are more profitable than non-ad tiers.

“Scaling ads to become a more meaningful contributor to our business in ‘25 and beyond,” Netflix said.

Netflix’s ads membership grew another 65% in Q1 over the previous one, after rising 70% the quarter before, and 40% of signups in ad markets continue to be for those ad plans.

Tech

Meta’s not telling where it got its AI training data

Today Meta unleashed its ChatGPT competitor, Meta AI, across its apps and as a standalone. The company boasts that it is running on its latest, greatest AI model, Llama 3, which was trained on “data of the highest quality”! A dataset seven times larger than Llama2! And includes 4 times more code!

What is that training data? There the company is less loquacious.

Meta said the 15 trillion tokens on which its trained came from “publicly available sources.” Which sources? Meta told The Verge’s Alex Heath that it didn’t include Meta user data, but didn’t give much more in the way of specifics.

It did mention that it includes AI-generated data, or synthetic data: “we used Llama 2 to generate the training data for the text-quality classifiers that are powering Llama 3.” There are plenty of known issues with synthetic or AI-created data, foremost of which is that it can exacerbate existing issues with AI, because it’s liable to spit out a more concentrated version of any garbage it is ingesting.

AI companies are turning to such data because there’s not enough good, public data on the entire internet to train their increasingly greedy AI models. (Meta had reportedly floated buying a publisher like Simon & Schuster to satisfy its insatiable data needs.)

Meta, of course, isn’t the only company that’s tight-lipped about where its AI data is coming from. In a now infamous interview with WSJ’s Johanna Stern, OpenAI’s chief technology officer Mira Murati was unable to answer questions about what Sora, OpenAI’s video generating app, was trained on. YouTube? Facebook? Instagram — she said she wasn’t sure.

What is that training data? There the company is less loquacious.

Meta said the 15 trillion tokens on which its trained came from “publicly available sources.” Which sources? Meta told The Verge’s Alex Heath that it didn’t include Meta user data, but didn’t give much more in the way of specifics.

It did mention that it includes AI-generated data, or synthetic data: “we used Llama 2 to generate the training data for the text-quality classifiers that are powering Llama 3.” There are plenty of known issues with synthetic or AI-created data, foremost of which is that it can exacerbate existing issues with AI, because it’s liable to spit out a more concentrated version of any garbage it is ingesting.

AI companies are turning to such data because there’s not enough good, public data on the entire internet to train their increasingly greedy AI models. (Meta had reportedly floated buying a publisher like Simon & Schuster to satisfy its insatiable data needs.)

Meta, of course, isn’t the only company that’s tight-lipped about where its AI data is coming from. In a now infamous interview with WSJ’s Johanna Stern, OpenAI’s chief technology officer Mira Murati was unable to answer questions about what Sora, OpenAI’s video generating app, was trained on. YouTube? Facebook? Instagram — she said she wasn’t sure.

Today’s earnings: Who’s making money edition

Here are some some notable numbers out this morning, as earnings season gathers steam. Thursday’s main event will be Netflix after the close of trading. (Keep an eye on its advertising business.) But until then...

7.13%

The 30-year fixed rate mortgage is back above 7%, according to weekly numbers from the Mortgage Bankers Association, the highest level in four months. High borrowing costs are creating havoc for would-be buyers, as affordability lingers at the low levels not seen consistently since the late 1980s.

Business

Amazon’s spy ops on rivals: shell companies, printed docs, and a fake Japanese streetwear brand

Some companies check out rivals’ websites, stores and public filings to stay abreast of the competition. Amazon made its own fake shell company and brands, transacted hundreds of thousands of dollars per year undercover on competitors’ platforms, and kept its intel operation a secret for nearly a decade even from others at Amazon, according to a fascinating investigation by the Wall Street Journal.

Working as a seller called Big River, a secret group of Amazon employees gained access to rival platforms, including Walmart, FedEx, and Alibaba. They used Big River email addresses and went to seller conferences as Big River employees. They even stayed hidden within Amazon itself. These employees would take screenshots of competitors’ systems that they would then show others at Amazon in person to avoid an email paper trail.

Perhaps most strange of all, the company created a fake Japanese streetwear brand called “Not So Ape” (clearly a play on A Bathing Ape) and continues to sell products from the brand on a Shopify store, presumably as an attempt to learn the inner workings of the shopping platform. Of course, copying is old hat for Amazon.

In meetings where they’d use this clandestine information to inform Amazon’s own business practices, the group resorted to literal paper. “[T]he team avoided distributing presentations electronically to Amazon executives. Instead, they printed the presentations and numbered the documents. Executives could look at the reports and take notes, but at the end of the meeting, team members collected the papers to ensure that they had all copies."

Working as a seller called Big River, a secret group of Amazon employees gained access to rival platforms, including Walmart, FedEx, and Alibaba. They used Big River email addresses and went to seller conferences as Big River employees. They even stayed hidden within Amazon itself. These employees would take screenshots of competitors’ systems that they would then show others at Amazon in person to avoid an email paper trail.

Perhaps most strange of all, the company created a fake Japanese streetwear brand called “Not So Ape” (clearly a play on A Bathing Ape) and continues to sell products from the brand on a Shopify store, presumably as an attempt to learn the inner workings of the shopping platform. Of course, copying is old hat for Amazon.

In meetings where they’d use this clandestine information to inform Amazon’s own business practices, the group resorted to literal paper. “[T]he team avoided distributing presentations electronically to Amazon executives. Instead, they printed the presentations and numbered the documents. Executives could look at the reports and take notes, but at the end of the meeting, team members collected the papers to ensure that they had all copies."

Crypto
Jack Morse
4/17/24

Worldcoin pivots to the blockchain… with a 'humans only' discount

Worldcoin, the “proof of personhood” crypto project launched by OpenAI’s Sam Altman, said it plans to launch its own ethereum layer-2 (L2) blockchain dubbed World Chain. The pitch: a blockchain where it’s both easier and cheaper for people to transact than bots.

Worldcoin has made waves for its iris-scanning metallic orb that promises a future where people can mathematically prove they’re real humans and not AI bots.

But it’s run into trouble: the orbs have been banned across Europe and Africa, and the associated WLD crypto token has plunged 50% over the past month.

For project insiders, who reportedly received a token allocation of 25% of supply, that could equal significant losses. 

Which is what may make World Chain attractive. Crypto exchange Coinbase launched its own L2, Base, last year. Base has since seen rapid user growth — activity that’s generated the exchange millions of dollars in weekly fees

Worldcoin could benefit from similar revenue if its L2 is adopted around the world.

But it’s run into trouble: the orbs have been banned across Europe and Africa, and the associated WLD crypto token has plunged 50% over the past month.

For project insiders, who reportedly received a token allocation of 25% of supply, that could equal significant losses. 

Which is what may make World Chain attractive. Crypto exchange Coinbase launched its own L2, Base, last year. Base has since seen rapid user growth — activity that’s generated the exchange millions of dollars in weekly fees

Worldcoin could benefit from similar revenue if its L2 is adopted around the world.