Thursday Apr.09, 2020

🏥 The shape of recovery

"_I found an L, Woody... Oh, that's the bad one?_"
"_I found an L, Woody... Oh, that's the bad one?_"

Hey Snackers,

Excellent news out of New Zealand: the Prime Minister just confirmed that the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy are, in fact, considered "essential workers."

US markets rallied again as positive comments from Dr. Anthony Fauci raised national optimism. Stocks also popped after Bernie Sanders dropped out of the 2020 presidential race. The Dow closed above 23K for the first time in almost a month.

BTW — this is our last newsletter of this week since markets are closed tomorrow for Good Friday.

Recover

Which (alphabetic) shape will an economic recovery take? Depends on how long we're shut for

How many letters in an economic recovery?... Apparently, four. We know the economy has tanked since February — the COVID-19 pandemic spelled an abrupt end for the longest economic expansion in US history. Now economists are sifting through alphabet soup to determine what shape a recovery from this looming recession will take. The four main contenders:

  • V Shape: A quick and dramatic decline (check), followed by an equally quick recovery (not check). The economy needs to reopen ASAP if we want this best-case scenario to happen — and we may already be too late.
  • U Shape: More gradual than V shape — the economy finds a bottom and stays there for a while (up to 2 years before recovering). Most recessions since 1945 have been U shaped.
  • W Shape: AKA, a "double-dip" recession. This would happen if, after a V recovery, we have another big outbreak and the economy has to shut down again.
  • L Shape: Worst-case scenario — more like a non-recovery. A steep decline followed by a long stay at the bottom (could take up to 10 years to recover). That's the (depressing) letter Barclays bank just highlighted.

Which one will it be?... It depends on how long the economy is shut down for. And that largely depends on how quickly we can get the virus under control. Each day the economy is closed means more unemployment and more business losses — so recovery time increases daily.

The Multiplier Effect is a powerful thing... Your spending (or lack thereof) = someone else's income (or lack thereof):

  • You spend $50 on a jean jacket at a local store. The store owners makes $50.
  • They pay their salesperson, then order more jackets from Levi's, which in turn pays its own employees and the fabric suppliers.
  • The Levi's employees and the supplier's employees spend that money for their own purchases, and the cycle continues.
  • Right now the multiplier effect is working against us — the longer that's true, the longer a recovery will take.
Owe

Slack's spot at the Wall Street lunch table — Airbnb's not invited (unless it pays for everyone)

The risky table is at the back... Airbnb and Slack just sealed 2 nearly identical deals, with two very different deal terms. Slack's office messaging, email-crushing biz model is thriving in the corona-conomy. Airbnb's travel-centric pad rental biz? Not so much. Despite these differences, they both decided it was time to borrow some cash.

  • Slack offered $750M in debt, which it'll have to pay back in 2025 (either in cash, shares, or a combo). Slack will only have to pay 0.5% interest on the loan.
  • Airbnb offered $1B for similar debt, but it'll have to pay investors back at a whopping more than 10% interest rate.

What's your risk premium?... Not a Hinge-appropriate question. Slack is borrowing cash because it's growing (to thrive) — Airbnb is borrowing because it's sinking (to survive). That makes it way more risky. Investors can smell desperation:

  • As bookings plunge and cancellations soar, Airbnb is refunding guests and shelling out $250M to cover hosts' losses. It projects sales could fall by 54% this year.
  • So investors demand a 10% premium for putting their money at risk with Airbnb, while Slack gets to borrow for way less cost.

The virus premium is unavoidable... for Airbnb, WeWork, and any travel/rental company unable to operate right now. Most are affected by this risk premium, because we're living in risky times. And companies that are faring well in the corona-conomy — like Slack, Zoom, and Netflix — can't pat themselves on the back either. They're just lucky that their businesses weren't as affected as others by unforeseeable circumstances.

What else we’re Snackin’

  • Emoji: Use of the 🏀 emoji on Venmo payments fell 98% (compared to March 2017), while 😷 emoji use grew 2000% — a neat emoji tracker from Quartz.
  • Share: Jack Dorsey will donate $1B worth of his Square stock (around 28% of his net worth) to fund COVID-19 relief and other charities — track donations on this Google sheet.
  • Served: Zoom is hit with a class-action lawsuit from a shareholder who claims the company exaggerated its privacy standards.
  • Pivot: Panera is now selling and delivering groceries — like bagels, bread, and milk — as its restaurant sales plunge.
  • Build: GM will make 30K ventilators for the US under a $490M contract with the government, the first under the Defense Production Act.
  • Mickey: Disney announces that Disney+ now has over 50M subscribers — 2X as many as it had on February 4th.

Thursday

Disclosure: Authors of this Snacks own shares of Slack and Square. The debt securities mentioned were for illustrative purposes, and not a recommendation'.

ID: 1146605

Get Your News

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Stories

2024-04-26-alphabet-sankey

Alphabet’s record Q1

Search and Cloud continue to deliver, as Alphabet announces its first-ever dividend

Stork delivery

America’s birth rate keeps dropping

Births in the US, like almost everywhere else, are on the decline

2024-04-26-nestle-new

Nestlé, the world’s largest food company, is struggling

World

Tangential remarks

Nicolai Tangen, the CEO who holds the purse strings of Norway’s $1.6 trillion sovereign wealth fund, thinks that his fellow Europeans don’t quite stack up to US employees when it comes to pure hustle, telling the Financial Times in a recent interview that there is a difference in “the general level of ambition” and thatthe Americans just work harder”. 

Tangen has clearly been putting his money — or more specifically Norway’s — where his mouth is: the sprawling Norwegian oil fund, now one of the largest investors on the planet, has been pumping more capital into its US holdings in the past decade, while decreasing its investment into European entities.

The troublesome news for our European readers? Tangen might be onto something. According to data from the OECD, American workers are putting in almost 60 hours a year more than the weighted average for OECD nations… a benchmark that workers from countries in the European Union are already ~180 hours shy of.

Hours worked

Tangen has clearly been putting his money — or more specifically Norway’s — where his mouth is: the sprawling Norwegian oil fund, now one of the largest investors on the planet, has been pumping more capital into its US holdings in the past decade, while decreasing its investment into European entities.

The troublesome news for our European readers? Tangen might be onto something. According to data from the OECD, American workers are putting in almost 60 hours a year more than the weighted average for OECD nations… a benchmark that workers from countries in the European Union are already ~180 hours shy of.

Hours worked
Go Deeper with Market Depth

Nasdaq TotalView powers the need-to-know data serious investors rely on.

Scuba Diving in the Wild Blue Yonder in French Polynesia
Power

$2T is the new $1T

Alphabet’s phenomenal earnings yesterday was enough to push the search giant’s market cap beyond $2 trillion, joining the likes of NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft.

Sunset Moonrise in New York City

Air taxi Blade is actually an organ transport business in disguise

How the helicopter fleet quietly became America's biggest airborne ambulance.

Your inbox is ready

Subscribe and thrive

Snacks provides fresh takes on the financial news you need to start your day. Chartr provides data visualizations on business, entertainment, and society. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

$70B

Alphabet shares are soaring in the after-market session, with a initial jump of more than 10% implying a gain of upwards of about $200B in market value when the stock opens tomorrow morning.

Google’s parent company crushed earnings expectations, initiated a cash dividend for the first time, and authorized a fresh $70B in share repurchases for good measure. The market likes it very much.

Business

No, Apple hasn’t cut its Vision Pro production estimates in half

Quite a few news outlets are reporting that Apple thinks it’s only going to sell 400,000 to 450,000 Vision Pros in 2024, compared a “market consensus” of 700,000 to 800,000. They’re all citing a note from Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.

Obviously there’s no question that Apple’s $3,500 face computer will have a limited audience and could be a huge flop, but this also doesn’t seem like accurate news.

The issue is that 1) this 400,000 number isn’t new. Back in July of 2023, the Financial Times reported that Apple planned to make fewer than 400,000 units in 2024, reducing its initial projections of 1M units, citing two people close to Apple and, the Chinese contract manufacturer assembling the device. 2) It's unclear who was estimating 700,000-800,000 Vision Pros in the first place, but it appears that it was Ming-Chi Kuo himself?

The issue is that 1) this 400,000 number isn’t new. Back in July of 2023, the Financial Times reported that Apple planned to make fewer than 400,000 units in 2024, reducing its initial projections of 1M units, citing two people close to Apple and, the Chinese contract manufacturer assembling the device. 2) It's unclear who was estimating 700,000-800,000 Vision Pros in the first place, but it appears that it was Ming-Chi Kuo himself?

 Max Holloway and Mark Zuckerberg

Meta exhaustingly tries to merge the metaverse and AI

Gonna have to rename the company... again

Rani Molla4/25/24